Public Health Campaigners Turn the Screws on Freedom – The Daily Sceptic

Watch out for the ratchet effect, says Abbie MacGregor. Otherwise we risk sleepwalking into the end of personal responsibility, where every aspect of life is subject to bureaucratic control in the name of public health.
Prof. Darron Johns · 8 days ago · 4 minutes read


The Ratchet Effect: How Public Health Fanatics Ensnare Us With Incrementalism

The Illusion of Reasonable Measures

The public health playbook often relies on a deceptive tactic: the ratchet effect. Instead of presenting radical objectives upfront, campaigners introduce seemingly small, reasonable measures. These incremental steps gradually erode opposition, paving the way for increasingly restrictive policies. As Ronald Coase wisely noted, "If you torture the data enough, it will confess to anything." This manipulation extends beyond data to encompass a strategic dismantling of personal freedoms.

With billions allocated to public health initiatives, can we afford to be blind to this manipulative strategy? The answer, unequivocally, is no.

The Tobacco Trap: A Case Study in Incrementalism

The evolution of tobacco regulations perfectly illustrates the ratchet effect in action. First came smoking bans in public places, then the concealment of cigarette packaging, followed by plain packaging mandates. Each step was presented as a logical progression, masked by public health concerns. Yet, the ultimate goal – complete prohibition – remained subtly hidden.

Even as arguments justifying these policies, like the dangers of second-hand smoke, are debunked, the relentless march towards prohibition continues. Tobacco control serves as a deceptive blueprint for extending this strategy to other areas, often with even less justification.

From Cigarettes to Baby Formula: Expanding the Scope of Control

The ratchet effect extends its reach beyond tobacco, targeting even baby formula. Existing regulations restricting formula marketing are now being leveraged to call for complete bans. While breastfeeding offers undeniable benefits, forcing it upon all mothers is an overreach equivalent to banning Caesarean sections. This illustrates the insidious nature of the ratchet effect: leveraging seemingly reasonable restrictions to justify increasingly draconian measures.

Eroding Public Trust and Lowering the Burden of Proof

The insidiousness of the ratchet effect lies in its ability to manipulate public trust. Each policy, viewed in isolation, appears reasonable, lulling the public into a false sense of security. But history reveals the truth: once one restriction is in place, another inevitably follows. This strategy gradually lowers the burden of proof for new interventions, ultimately allowing virtually anything to be framed as a public health crisis.

Consider the recent classification of "school avoidance syndrome" – essentially truancy – as a psychiatric issue. This highlights the ever-expanding reach of public health interventions, fueled by ever-increasing funding.

A Self-Sustaining Juggernaut: The Public Health Industrial Complex

The vast sums of money poured into public health create a self-sustaining system with no incentive for resolution. The example of alcohol-related deaths in Scotland is telling. Despite successful reductions through education and training, minimum alcohol pricing was implemented, arguably contributing to a subsequent rise in deaths. This exemplifies the relentless drive for further intervention, regardless of existing successes.

Lack of Transparency and the Manipulation of Narrative

The lack of transparency within public health institutions and charities further exacerbates the problem. The limited scrutiny they face allows the ratchet effect to continue unchecked. This is exemplified by the UK gambling regulator's failure to address numerous instances of misinformation, enabling campaigners to manipulate the narrative and advance their agendas.

Targeting Slot Machines: A Calculated Maneuver

The recent focus on slot machines by anti-gambling activists illustrates the strategic manipulation inherent in the ratchet effect. By targeting a seemingly less politically sensitive area, campaigners aim to establish a precedent for broader restrictions on gambling. The flawed argument that specific products, rather than individual vulnerabilities, cause addiction serves as a tool to justify further interventions.

The Price of Complacency: A Loss of Freedom and Personal Responsibility

The ratchet effect is not a theoretical concept but a demonstrable strategy. Without vigilance and resistance, we risk losing our freedoms incrementally, surrendering control over our lives to an ever-expanding bureaucracy in the name of public health.

Abbie MacGregor is the Head of Communications at the Gamblers Consumer Forum.